Skip to main content

The importance of transitions...

I was just having a look at github's new tree slider.


In any case, it got me interested in the importance of transitions. Back in the old, pre-ajax, pre-broadband days, we would click on a link, go get a cup of coffee and then come back to a new screen. In the meantime the little "loading" icon would spin which would let us know that something was happening.

Nowadays, not only is it possible to change part of a page without reloading the whole page (thanks to AJAX), but with our new browsers and broadband connections, this could change so fast that we don't even notice.

I will be the first to admit that early versions of JavaScript transitions were not only buggy, but they seemed to be a luxury. For a start, the fades and slides were slow and jittery and led to a bad user experience. The extra JS libraries also added to page load. At the end of the day, who cares how we got where we were going as long as we got there.

Now however, they seem a bit more of a necessity. They let the user know what happened on the page and where.

Going forward, it would be nice to see some conventions appear as well. Fade in for dialogs, slide left for new page, slide right for old, etc...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Master of my domain

Hi All, I just got myself a new domain ( http://www.skuunk.com ). The reason is that Blogspot.com is offering cheap domain via GoDaddy.com and I thought after having this nickname for nigh on 10 years it was time to buy the domain before someone else did (also I read somewhere that using blogspot.com in your domain is the equivalent of an aol.com or hotmail.com email address...shudder...). Of course I forgot that I would have to re-register my blog everywhere (which is taking ages) not to mention set up all my stats stuff again. *sigh*. It's a blogger's life... In any case, don't forget to bookmark the new address and to vote me up on Technorati !
Post a Comment
Read more

Responsive Web Design

I wanted to go over Responsive Web Design using CSS. In the old days of web development, we had to code to common screen sizes (i.e. 800 X 600, 1024 X 768) and we patiently waited for people to upgrade their computers to have a decent amount of screen real estate so we could design things the way we really wanted. We also took on semi stretchy web layouts etc to expand and contract appropriately. Then about 2 or 3 years ago, Apple released this little device called an iPhone with a 320 X 480 resolution which took the world by storm and suddenly a lot of people were viewing your website on a tiny screen again... Anyways, as it can be difficult to design a site which looks good on 320 X 480 AND 1680 X 1050, we need to come up with some kind of solution. One way is to sniff the client and then use an appropriate stylesheet, but then you are mixing CSS with either JavaScript or server side programming and also potentially maintaining a list of appropriate clients and stylesheets. Also, you
13 comments
Read more

jQuery: When does a library become a language?

jQuery is a great JavaScript library which allows web developers to write cross platform code, but some of its syntax looks like it is based more on Ruby than JavaScript. When does a library become a language? So first of all, what is the difference betwen a programming library and a programming language? A programming language is a means by which we (as humans) can give instructions to a computer to get it to do various tasks (algorithms, computations, etc...). They are largely artificial constructs created for human readability which then need to be compiled or interpreted into actual instructions which the computer can then carry out. A compiler turns a program into machine readable instructions ahead of time (compile time) where as an interpreter does so on the fly (runtime). Languages such as C and Java are generally compiled and JavaScript, Perl and Ruby are generally interpreted. While there is no real reason why this has to be the case, these factors normally affect the syntax
7 comments
Read more