Skip to main content

Reading AJAX XHR File Uploads in Sinatra

So in my last post I talked about Drag and Drop file uploading with qq.FileUploader (http://valums.com/ajax-upload/).

Anyways, I discovered that qq.FileUploader uses AJAX/XHR to post the file uploads. What I also discovered is that these file uploads need to be handled in a separate manner from a regular file upload form post.

A normal form post (when File upload XHR requests are not available on the client like in Internet Explorer) passes in the following parameters


params: {"qqfile"=>{:type=>"image/png", :head=>"Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"qqfile\"; filename=\"bb2.png\"\r\nContent-Type: image/png\r\n", :tempfile=>#, :name=>"qqfile", :filename=>"bb2.png"}, "upload_type"=>"rec", "id"=>"24db8cab-285a-abcb-cb47-4daceee977ca"}

Sinatra then reads the :tempfile and :filename parameters to write the file to the server


name = params[:qqfile][:filename]

# create the file path
path = File.join(directory, name)
# write the file
File.open(path, "wb") { |f| f.write(params[:qqfile][:tempfile].read) }


However, if you use a browser that supports XHR uploads, the parameters look a little different


params: {"qqfile"=>"device1.jpg", "upload_type"=>"invoice", "id"=>"24db8cab-285a-abcb-cb47-4daceee977ca"}

So this had me stumped. There was an article I found on the internets (http://onehub.com/blog/posts/designing-an-html5-drag-drop-file-uploader-using-sinatra-and-jquery-part-1/) which talked extensively on how to do the JavaScript side but then at the bottom conveniently left out how to handle the server side (saying it was easy to work out). Well, it wasn't! So that's why I am writing this post

In any case, I won't keep you in suspense any longer...


name = env['HTTP_X_FILENAME']

string_io = request.body # will return a StringIO

data_bytes = string_io.read # read the stream as bytes

# create the file path
path = File.join(directory, name)

# Write it to disk...
File.open(path, 'w') {|f| f.write(data_bytes) }


The final part is that qq.FileUploader does not give you the option to specify which action to post to depending on the type of upload (XHR vs normal) so I had to put in a fork in the server code to figure out how to handle the request. I am basically checking to see if qqfile is of type String, in which case I handle it as an XHR upload, otherwise I handle it as a normal file upload.


# if qqfile is a string, we are using XHR upload, else use regular upload
if params[:qqfile].class == String
name = params[:qqfile]

string_io = request.body # will return a StringIO

data_bytes = string_io.read # read the stream as bytes

# create the file path
path = File.join(directory, name)

# Write it to disk...
File.open(path, 'w') {|f| f.write(data_bytes) }
else #regular file upload
name = params[:qqfile][:filename]

# create the file path
path = File.join(directory, name)
# write the file
File.open(path, "wb") { |f| f.write(params[:qqfile][:tempfile].read) }
end


I haven't tried it in Rails yet, but I am sure it will be similar. I hope this helps...

Comments

Ted said…
Hi, I'm new on Sinatra and Ruby and I don't understand how to use your tutorial. which method? post? put? Can you show your ".rb" complete file?
Ted said…
From my webkit console

"Request URL:http://MYURL/upload?qqfile=file.jpg
Request method:POST
Status:500 Internal Server Error
Intestazioni di richiesta
Content-Length:52446
Content-Type:application/octet-stream
Origin: http://MYURL
Referer:http://MYURL/upload
User-Agent:Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7; it-it) AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.5 Safari/533.21.1
X-File-Name:file.jpg
X-Requested-With:XMLHttpRequest"
entropie said…
Thanks a lot, that request.body was what i missed. Works also for any rack apps like ramaze.

Popular posts from this blog

Master of my domain

Hi All, I just got myself a new domain ( http://www.skuunk.com ). The reason is that Blogspot.com is offering cheap domain via GoDaddy.com and I thought after having this nickname for nigh on 10 years it was time to buy the domain before someone else did (also I read somewhere that using blogspot.com in your domain is the equivalent of an aol.com or hotmail.com email address...shudder...). Of course I forgot that I would have to re-register my blog everywhere (which is taking ages) not to mention set up all my stats stuff again. *sigh*. It's a blogger's life... In any case, don't forget to bookmark the new address and to vote me up on Technorati !

Elixir - destructuring, function overloading and pattern matching

Why am I covering 3 Elixir topics at once? Well, perhaps it is to show you how the three are used together. Individually, any of these 3 are interesting, but combined, they provide you with a means of essentially getting rid of conditionals and spaghetti logic. Consider the following function. def greet_beatle(person) do case person.first_name do "John" -> "Hello John." "Paul" -> "Good day Paul." "George" -> "Georgie boy, how you doing?" "Ringo" -> "What a drummer!" _-> "You are not a Beatle, #{person.first_name}" end end Yeah, it basically works, but there is a big old case statement in there. If you wanted to do something more as well depending on the person, you could easily end up with some spaghetti logic. Let's see how we can simplify this a little. def greet_beatle(%{first_name: first_name}) do case first_name d

Speeding up RSpec

So today I have been looking into getting our enormous battery of tests to run faster. I have yet to find anything that works for Cucumber, but I did find an interesting way to speed up RSpec which is detailed here. https://makandracards.com/makandra/950-speed-up-rspec-by-deferring-garbage-collection Basically, it seems that by not collecting garbage too frequently, you can make your tests run much faster (at the expense of memory management of course). We observed a 30% reduction in the time it takes to run an RSpec test suite. I did try to implement this on Cucumber, however because we need to store much more in memory to set up and tear down our objects, it meant that I kept running out of memory when I wasn't using the default Garbage Collection and the tests took even longer (so, buyer beware). I suppose if you had a small set of features though you might see some benefit.